Skip to main content

Why corruption will be a thing of the past.

I have been doing some thinking recently on the corruption rampant in India. Why is nobody doing anything about it ? It is not that we lack the infrastructure to deal with it. Far from it. What we lack is in my opinion the will to police it. So, the real question is why are we not policing it ? After much thought on this matter, I have come to the conclusion that till now corruption was in the National security interest. Till now. Recent events tell us that it has lost that quality and hence, corruption will become punishable once again. Let me explain.

Fig 1. Fictitious 'National average bribe taken' around the time of 1993 Bombay blasts.

Imagine you are responsible for finding out terrorist or insurgency activities. How would you go about it ? You cannot have information about all the citizens of any country at your disposal. So, the easier way out is to have some kind of statistical test which will predict if terrorist activity is going to happen soon. How would you do that ? Here comes the genius part. Imagine the 1993 Bombay blasts, and the period immediately before that. What happened ? Many people were bribed 'higher than usual' to keep things quiet. The operative word here is 'higher than usual' in other words, if you plot the National average bribe taken in a month, lets say, then the period before 1993 Blasts might look like what is given in Fig1. So, the blip you see there has predictive value. It could also mean a big government contract, but these things the government would know. So, a blip in the chart would show that higher than average bribes are being taken, which could mean a big operation.

For along time I thought, how could one monitor the 'average bribe' taken ? Surely, people would be secretive about it, so how the hell can we do it ? Then, the answer came to me in a flash of brilliance. Of course, the government has been lenient towards corrupt officials since a long time. Why ? In the interst of national security. So, by being lenient, they have cleverly made everyone belive that they can safely deposit their black money in banks and since banks were computerised much before anything else, so getting such statistics is no big deal. The crucial question one must ask is, why is the government taking a tough stance against corruption now ? Again it is simplicity itself. Take a look at the 26/11 incident. No bribes given, no bribes taken. All planning done in Pakistan and funded by its agencies (govt and non-govt). So, we did not have access to the blips in their national average bribes. So, bribery has ceased to have any predictive value. And as everyone knows, bribery hurts the economy, so we are being sensible now. Unless..... The frankestein monster created by the government comes back to bite its ass.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Butter, Oil and Zephyr

    Well, have been doing a lot of a MD simulations lately. My current favourite is implicit solvent simulations. The entire explicit solvent thing always seemed too brute force to me. Its not elegant, and nor is it computationally feasible for larger systems. Implicit solvent simulations suffer from their own problems, but I would consider their future much brighter. This is simply sue to the larger time scales that you can access using these simulations even on a normal desktop system. Larger time scales means better averages and thermodynamic properties are always averages, so better match with experiment.    Speaking of Implicit solvent simulations, Gromacs does a good job, as well as any other currently. I especially like the OBC model for calculating Born radii which I am glad to say, I copied to MUST_READ folder when it first came out. It might still be lying there, that is another thing, but at least I can appreciate when a good...
1 comment
Read more

An early essay on co-translational folding

   One of the earliest essays I wrote on the co-translational folding concept. This was for a course on protein folding that Prof Balaram takes at IISc. I am reproducing it in full, with missing punctuation marks added. At one point, I say that I have not been able to find out why it is assumed that refolding is a good substitute for in vivo protein folding. I did know even then, but I chose not to talk about it. I did so, since I cannot talk about the topic without calling everyone involved an idiot. Also, I have omitted the references as I cannot bring myself to format them properly. Rest assured that nothing I said in the essay is without literature support. Co-translational folding Introduction    Protein folding is one of the major unsolved problems of molecular biology. The problem is as follows : given that a gene encodes a unique structure (which performs a unique function), how does this information conversion take place ? it is assumed (barrin...
Post a Comment
Read more

I am a Reverend now!!!

  I have been an atheist for most of my life. I have never truly believed that God exists or such thing. More recently, I have started looking down upon people that do believe in God. Not a hatred kind of looking down upon them, but rather a pitiful look down or maybe even a cuter look down upon. Like when you see a child earnestly insisting that Santa Claus exists. You pity the child's ignorance and you find it cute, but secretly you also get a bit tense knowing that his/her ignorance cannot last very long. And, you wonder if that earnest child could really handle the news when it hits them hard.   So, in summary all I am saying is, people who believe in a God are stupid. They should grow up and really think hard about what they mean when they say they believe in God. Half of them will mutter and sputter and fail to come up with what they really believe. Most would say something asinine like "I am sure there is something out there" or "There will be chaos if n...
Post a Comment
Read more